Cases 1 - 10 of 2,104
Shepard v. Brazos County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2024cv01913
Petitioner:
Tyrone Radale Shepard
Respondent:
Brazos County Sheriff Department and Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Hicks et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Corey Jackson
Defendant:
Jason Hicks, Cortnie Siess, Melody Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHEPARD v. JOHN AND JANE DOES et al
as 2:2024cv05823
Plaintiff:
MACK CHARLES SHEPARD
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES, UNION CO. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, HUDSON CO. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Okorie v. Foxworth et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ikechukwu Hyginius Okorie
Defendant:
Andrew Foxworth, Citizens Bank, Sheila H. Smallwood and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
CAPPUCCIO v. UNITY BANK et al
as 2:2024cv05695
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CAPPUCCIO
Defendant:
UNITY BANK, FEIN, SUCH, KAHN & SHEPARD, P.C. and VINCENT DIMAIOLO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Shepard and Associates, Inc., et al v. Lokrin Technology, LLC
as 24-3348
Plaintiff:
SHEPARD AND ASSOCIATES, INC., dba Lokring Southwest Company
Defendant:
LOKRIN TECHNOLOGY, LLC, JARED GUIDRY, et al. and TUBE-MAC INDUSTRIES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Shepard et al
as 3:2024cv00182
Counter Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Counter Claimant:
Samia Shepard
Defendant:
Sentryx Security, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
