Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Mike Webb v. Alfred Street Baptist Church
as 23-1397
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAJOR MIKE WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
ALFRED STREET BAPTIST CHURCH, GLENN YOUNGKIN, in official capacity, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Webb v. Alfred Street Baptist Church et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Major Mike Webb
Defendant:
Alfred Street Baptist Church, Glen Youngkin, Virginia Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shiloh Baptist Church v. Underwriters at Lloyds London
as 2:2021cv02588
Plaintiff:
Shiloh Baptist Church
Defendant:
Underwriters at Lloyds London
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
American Economy Insurance Company et al v. Shiloh Baptist Church of Jacksonvill, Florida, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00141
Plaintiff:
American Economy Insurance Company and American States Insurance Company
Defendant:
Shiloh Baptist Church of Jacksonvill, Florida, Inc., Darrell Lewis Gilyard, Kesha Emerson and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
State of Maryland, Department of the Environment v. Honeywell International Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00724
Plaintiff:
State of Maryland, Department of the Environment
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc., Honeywell International Inc., Honeywell International Inc. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Baltimoreans United in Leadership Development ("BUILD"), Baltimoreans United in Leadership Development ("BUILD"), Baltimoreans United in Leadership Development ("BUILD") and others
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Maryland, Department of the Environment, Honeywell International Inc. and Maryland Port Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
