Cases 1 - 10 of 1,994
Young v. Attorney General of the State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-2620
Petitioner:
RONALD KELLY YOUNG
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, CHARLES L RYAN and others
Tripati v. Carter, et al.
as 24-2191
Plaintiff:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant:
PAUL EDWARD CARTER, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNKNOWN CARTER, MICHAEL EVAN GOTTFRIED and others
Richards #221817 v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Renee S Richards
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Unknown Martinez, Ryan Thornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shinn et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
Patrick Shinn and Paula Shinn
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
DK Fab Inc v Shinn & Son Inc et al
as 1:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
DK Fab Inc
Defendant:
Shinn & Son Inc and Satus Creek Farms LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson v. Cook et al
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Hasan H. Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Cook, FNU Shinn, FNU Bostic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Taubman v. Shinn, et al.
as 24-1607
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M. TAUBMAN
Defendant:
DAVID SHINN, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General of State of Arizona
Torrefranca v. Ryan et al
as 2:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Delmo Figura Torrefranca
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, David Shinn, Ramon Billyard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bells v. NDA, et al.
as 24-1085
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE B. BELLS, JR.
Defendant:
VICTORVILLE USP CORRECTIONS NDA, SHINN, MCCOLLOUGH and others
Jensen v. Shinn, et al.
as 24-1010
Plaintiff:
SHAWN JENSEN and ARIZONA CENTER FOR DISABILITY LAW
Defendant:
DAVID SHINN, Director and RICHARD PRATT, Interim Division Director, Division of Health Services, Arizona Department of Corrections, in their official capacities
Other:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
