Cases 41 - 50 of 92
State of Louisiana v. Shire,PLC et al
as 3:2013cv00543
Defendant:
Shire U.S., Inc., Shire, LLC and Shire, PLC
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Delzingo V. Shire U.S.Inc. et al
as MA/1:13-cv-11583
Plaintiff:
Limor Delzingo
Defendant:
Shire U.S., Inc. , Shire, LLC and Does 1-100
Delzingo V. Shire U.S.Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv11583
Plaintiff:
Limor Delzingo
Defendant:
Shire U.S. Inc., Shire, LLC and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Wadham v. Shire U.S., Inc. et al
as NCW/1:13-cv-00159
Plaintiff:
Mary Kathleen Wadham
Defendant:
Shire U.S., Inc. , Shire, LLC and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Wadham v. Shire U.S., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00159
Plaintiff:
Mary Kathleen Wadham
Defendant:
Shire U.S., Inc., Shire, LLC and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Shire LLC v. Neos Therapeutics, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01452
Plaintiff:
Shire LLC
Defendant:
Neos Therapeutics, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Neos Therapeutics, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Shire LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
In re: ADDERALL XR ANTITRUST
as 13-1232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and Value Drug Company, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Shire LLC and Shire U.S., Inc.
Barba et al v. Shire US, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv21158
Plaintiff:
Monica Barba and Jonathan Reisman
Defendant:
Shire US, Inc., Shire LLC and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Erin Shaffer v. Shire LLC et al
as 2:2013cv02363
Defendant:
Does, Shire LLC and Shrie US Inc
Plaintiff:
Erin Shaffer
NETWALL v. SHIRE U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01669
Plaintiff:
ALLYSON NETWALL
Defendant:
SHIRE U.S., INC. , SHIRE, LLC and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
