Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03269
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv06219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Spectrum Lab v. URZ Trendz
as 26-20639
Appellant:
Louis F. Teran
Defendant:
URZ Trendz, L.L.C., also known as Fly Fresh Smoke
Plaintiff:
Spectrum Laboratories, L.L.C.
Anderson v. Smoke et al
as 2:2026cv00928
Defendant:
Pamela Butler, Prince Etheridge and Bradley Smoke
Plaintiff:
Carlos Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Ayash v. Smoke City Tobacco & Vape LLC, et al.
as 5:2026cv02740
Plaintiff:
Muthana Ayash
Defendant:
Smoke City Tobacco & Vape LLC and Imran Mohamed Alomari
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Malouf et, al. v. United States of America
as 0:2026cv62842
Defendant:
Fadi I. Malouf, Fatty's Market & Smoke Shop, Inc. and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023 a Food Stamp Program
Malouf et, al. v. United States of America
as 1:2026cv27104
Defendant:
Fadi I. Malouf, Fatty's Market & Smoke Shop, Inc. and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023 a Food Stamp Program
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv11785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Dabney v. Spark Smoke Shop LLC et al
as 6:2026cv02330
Plaintiff:
Justin Dabney
Defendant:
Spark Smoke Shop LLC and Stairway Smoke Shop LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
