Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Adamson et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2026cv00030
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Adamson, Jr., Robert M. Creighton, Edward R. Combs and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company, International Paper Corporation, Everett Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv03086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
General Motors LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv03384
Plaintiff:
General Motors LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, suchangtai, JHTRRXG Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
SMOOK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38522
Plaintiff:
GILBERT SMOOK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WINTNER-SMOOKE v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2018cv01358
Plaintiff:
KERRY WINTNER-SMOOKE
Defendant:
GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smook v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2017cv07111
Plaintiff:
Mark Smook
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc, Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smook v. Halifax Health, Inc
as 6:2015cv01581
Plaintiff:
Jason Smook
Defendant:
Halifax Health, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WILSON v. JACOBS
as 3:2012cv05098
Plaintiff:
TONY A. WILSON
Defendant:
SAHBRA SMOOK JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. JACOBS
as 3:2010cv03780
Plaintiff:
TONY A. WILSON
Defendant:
SAHBRA SMOOK JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
