Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lane v. O' Malley
as 6:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Sondra Lee Lane
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lane v. Saul
as 6:2019cv00102
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Sondra Lee Lane
Not Yet Classified:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cicciarelli v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv11871
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sondra Cicciarelli and Sondra Lee Cicciarelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00961
Plaintiff:
Sondra Lee
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lukes v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15421
Plaintiff:
Sondra Lee Lukes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Colvin
as 6:2014cv00123
Plaintiff:
Sondra Lee Lane
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HATTON et al v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv63467
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HATTON, SONDRA LEE HATTON and SONDRA LEE HATTON
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Ditty v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02239
Plaintiff:
Sondra Lee Ditty
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ditty v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv04318
Plaintiff:
Sondra Lee Ditty
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
