Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Our Lady of Sorrows Church, Inc. et al v. Mohammad
as 3:2020cv00672
Defendant:
Dr. Amir Mohammad
Plaintiff:
Father Bernard Paul Champagne and Our Lady of Sorrows Church, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Our Lady of Sorrows Church, Inc. et al v. Mohammad
as 3:2020cv00674
Defendant:
Dr. Amir Mohammad and Amir Mohammad
Plaintiff:
Our Lady of Sorrows Church, Inc., Dr. Bernard Paul Champagne and Bernard Paul Champagne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorrow v. City of Atlanta
as 1:2017cv02908
Plaintiff:
Lori Sene Sorrow
Defendant:
City of Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Herrera, et al v. City of Palmdale, et al
as 17-55761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM ROBERT HERRERA, MONA MOLINA HERRERA, Individually and on behalf of their minor child N. P. H., WILLIAM RYAN HERRERA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PALMDALE, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, BUD DAVIS and others
William Robert Herrera et al v. City of Palmdale et al
as 2:2016cv09453
Defendant:
Anne Ambrose, Anne Ambrose, Arcidiancono and others
Plaintiff:
Mona Molina Herrera, William Robert Herrera, William Ryan Herrera and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SORROWS v. CAMPBELL et al
as 4:2011cv00059
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SORROWS
Defendant:
LARRY CAMPBELL , OKALOOSA COUNTY FLORIDA and PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC
Counter_claimant:
LARRY CAMPBELL
Counter_defendant:
WILLIAM SORROWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv13236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
