Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Abbott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv12922
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Abbott, Shaunquesha Akles, Luis Arroyo and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Abbott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv01449
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Abbott, Shaunquesha Akles, Luis Arroyo and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Rosario v. McIntyre et al
as 3:2025cv00628
Plaintiff:
Ismael Felix Rosario
Defendant:
Correctional Officer McIntyre, Becky Salamon, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daaron Shears v. J. Lytle, et al
as 25-1491
Plaintiff:
DAARON SHEARS
Defendant:
J. LYTLE, Correctional Officer, JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer and LIEUTENANT STABLEY
WEIR v. BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS et al
as 3:2024cv11257
Defendant:
DIANE STABLEY, BOUROUGH COUNCIL OF SEA SIDE HEIGHTS, BOROUGH OF SEASIDE HEIGHTS and others
Plaintiff:
MARK WEIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kevin Coit v. B. Salamon, et al
as 24-1207
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
C/O ABDUL-QUDDUS, CAPTAIN ANDREWS, C/O BARNER and others
Shears v. Lytle et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Daaron Shears
Defendant:
J. Lytle, John Doe and Lieutenant Stabley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coit v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
B. Salamon, M. Rowe, Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barclay v. Stabley et al
as 4:2019cv02054
Defendant:
Lee, Campbell, McHenry and others
Plaintiff:
Erik Barclay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travillion v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv02075
Plaintiff:
Jamar L. Travillion
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #4, John/Jane Doe #1, Mr. FNU Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
