Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Stacy Shaw v. Commissioner of Social Securi
as 19-16552
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STACY SHAW
Shaw v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017at00672
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Stacy Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shaw v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv01355
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Stacy Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shaw et al v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2016cv17386
Plaintiff:
Stacy Shaw and Norman Shaw, Jr.
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moran v. Eastern Michigan University et al
as 2:2015cv10582
Plaintiff:
Brian Moran
Defendant:
Eastern Michigan University, Eastern Michigan University Department of Public Safety, Washtenaw, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Eastern Michigan University et al
as 2:2015cv10580
Defendant:
Eastern Michigan University, Eastern Michigan University Department of Public Safety, Washtenaw County and others
v. Eastern Michigan University et al
as 2:2015cv10581
Defendant:
Eastern Michigan University, Eastern Michigan University Department of Public Safety, Washtenaw County and others
Stacy Shaw v. Troy Steele
as 12-2392
Petitioner - Appellant:
Stacy Shaw
Respondent - Appellee:
Troy Steele, Superintendent of the Southeast Correctional Center
Stacy Shaw v. Troy Steele
as 4:2008cv00719
Petitioner:
Stacy Shaw
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw v. Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland, Inc) et al
as 3:2007cv01784
Plaintiff:
Stacy Shaw
Defendant:
Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland, Inc), Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland, Inc), Philips Medical Systems North America, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
