Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Sinclair-Stanton v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv03768
Plaintiff:
Diane Sinclair-Stanton
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Christina Stanton v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 23-35474
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINA KAY STANTON
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Stanton v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01281
Plaintiff:
Laura Stanton
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stanton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05858
Plaintiff:
Christina Kay Stanton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stanton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Stanton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stanton v. Kijakazi
as 5:2021cv10080
Plaintiff:
Kevin Stanton
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Commissioner of SSA and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Bair v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00955
Plaintiff:
Stanton Bair
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sullivan v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00636
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Timothy Stanton Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stanton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv06305
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Robin Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stanton v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00124
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Notice
Plaintiff:
Mr. Erick E. Stanton and Erick E. Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
