Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Nuneviller v. Stash et al
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Sara Michelle Nuneviller
Defendant:
Stash and Apex Clearing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stash v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Victoria Stash
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WHITE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10864
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN STASH WHITE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Javier Santiago v. Stash Investments LLC et al
as 2:2023cv05087
Plaintiff:
Javier Santiago
Defendant:
Stash Investments LLC and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wayne Harris v. Stash, et al
as 22-1910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT STASH, Wilkes Barre Police Department, OFFICER GATRELL, Wilkes Barre Police Department, PUBLIC DEFENDER JOHN DONAVON and others
Texan Wire Wheels, LLC v. Gaskin
as 4:2022cv00794
Plaintiff:
Texan Wire Wheels, LLC
Defendant:
Ceasar Ramont Gaskin DBA Stash Collectibles and Clothing and Ceasar Ramont Gaskin doing business as Stash Collectibles and Clothing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Byrd v. Home Stash LLC et al
as 4:2021cv01348
Plaintiff:
Marla Taylor Byrd
Defendant:
Home Stash LLC and Judge Ralph Swearingin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillispie v. Smash & Stash Jewelers et al
as 1:2021cv05129
Plaintiff:
M Kim Gillispie
Defendant:
Smash & Stash Jewelers, Frank Kravitz and Jerry Kravitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kamp v. Viridis North, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01035
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Kamp
Defendant:
Viridis North, LLC, Stash Ventures, LLC, Unknown Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
