Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Richards v. Washington State Auditor et al
as 3:2017cv05208
Plaintiff: Henry Richards
Defendant: Washington State Auditor , Washington State Department of Social and Health Services and Troy Niemeyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oates, et al v. North Carolina Department of State Treasurer, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00623
Plaintiff: Priscilla Everette Oates and Duarthur Oates
Defendant: North Carolina Department of State Treasurer , North Carolina State Bureau of Investigations, Lolita Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monica Lindeen v. SEC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1149
Petitioner: Monica J. Lindeen, Montana State Auditor, ex officio Montana Commissioner of Securities and Insurance
Respondent: Securities and Exchange Commission
Marlin v. Bump et al
as 1:2014cv13237
Plaintiff: Laura Marlin
Defendant: Suzanne Bump and Office of the State Auditor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nina Ringgold, et al v. USDC-SAC
as 13-71484
: In re: NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Petitioner: NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest: JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Nina Ringgold, et al v. Jerry Brown, et al
as 13-15366
Plaintiff - Appellant: NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Defendant - Appellee: JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Kenneth Tennant v. State of Iowa, et al
as 12-3741
Plaintiff - Appellant: Kenneth C. Tennant
Defendant - Appellee: State of Iowa, c/o David A. Vaudt, State Auditor, Tom Waterman, Iowa Supreme Court Judge, Donna Humpal, Iowa Supreme Court Clerk and others
Nina Ringgold, et al v. Jerry Brown, et al
as 12-16828
Plaintiff - Appellant: NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Defendant - Appellee: JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Nina Ringgold, et al v. USDC-SAC
as 12-72500
: In re: NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Petitioner: NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest: JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv11066
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?