Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Maiya McCoy, et al v. OH, et al
as 21-3964
Plaintiff:
MAIYA MCCOY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO, OHIO STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION and others
Defendant:
ELYRIA, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT
FULLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85316
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN FULLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edmonds #96224 v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2017cv03965
Plaintiff:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Stephen Fuller, Vincent Adam Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edmonds #96224 v. Fuller et al
as 2:2017cv02827
Petitioner:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Respondent:
Stephen Fuller, Vincent Carter, Mark Brnovich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fuller v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
as 5:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Stephen Fuller
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stephen Yagman v. Cornell Companies Inc et al
as 2:2014cv07555
Defendant:
Sarah Marie Schuh, Kevin Louis Kincey, Wes J. Mayhew and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yagman
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Robinson v. Fuller et al
as 5:2012cv02623
Plaintiff:
Chris Robinson
Defendant:
Stephen Fuller, Chuck Lister, Steve Adwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Fuller et al
as 1:2012cv02565
Plaintiff:
Carlton James Mathis
Defendant:
Stephen Fuller, Chuck Lister, Steve Adwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Fuller et al
as 2:2012cv02409
Plaintiff:
James Howard
Defendant:
Stephen Fuller, Chuck Lister, Steve Adwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
