Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Smith v. Reynolds
as 1:2024cv00517
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackie Robinson v. Stephen Reynolds
as 24-3147
Petitioner:
JACKIE ROBINSON
Respondent:
WARDEN STEPHEN REYNOLDS
Reynolds v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq03694
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Stephen Reynolds
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Charles Urban v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 19-4113
Defendant / Appellee:
RN LANGSTON, ALP BELTZ, ADAM KASTLER, Warden's Assistant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES A. URBAN
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC et al v. REYNOLDS, JR.
as 2:2019cv18043
Petitioner:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC and MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY FA NOTES HOLDINGS LLC
Respondent:
JOHN STEPHEN REYNOLDS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Reynolds v. Hudgins
as 4:2017cv04139
Plaintiff:
Stephen Reynolds
Defendant:
Richard Hudgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reynolds v. Warden Federal Prison Camp Yankton
as 4:2017cv04136
Petitioner:
Stephen Reynolds
Respondent:
Warden Federal Prison Camp Yankton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Firor v. Hardinger et al
as 1:2015cv02875
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Firor
Defendant:
George Hardinger, Stephen Reynolds, Dennis Strine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Hardinger et al
as 1:2015cv02583
Plaintiff:
Jeseph D. Walker, Sr.
Defendant:
George Hardinger, Stephen Reynolds, Dennis Strine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massachusetts Delivery Associa v. Healey
as 15-1908
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS DELIVERY ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Interested Party:
EZEQUIEL ANTONIO GARCIA, FRANCIS ARRIGO, STEPHEN REYNOLDS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
