Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Bob v. Alan M. Cass and Associates
as 14-1804
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nata S. Bob
Defendant - Appellee:
Alan M. Cass and Associates and Steve Cohen
McGee v. State of California et al
as 2:2014cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jefferson A. McGee
Defendant:
State of California, California Governor, California Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bob v. Alan Cass and Associates et al
as 1:2014cv01344
Plaintiff:
Nata S. Bob
Defendant:
Alan Cass and Associates and Steve Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Dallas TX National Security et al
as 3:2013cv04123
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Dallas TX National Security, COGIC, Daniel Dreysen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. Transportation & Infratructure Ind et al
as 3:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Transportation & Infratructure Ind, Oversight GOV-Reform, Ways & Means and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
King v. Wade et al
as 2:2013cv02167
Plaintiff:
Hattie L. King
Defendant:
Randy Wade, Steve Cohen, A.C. Wharton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc. v. Costello et al
as 9:2012cv80457
Plaintiff:
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
John Costello , Ann Cosello , John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc. v. Cohen et al
as 9:2012cv80080
Plaintiff:
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Steve Cohen, Vincent Pappalardo, Archie Bennett, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MINNETONKA MOCCASIN CO., INC. v. KILLER, INC. et al
as 5:2011cv05309
Defendant:
STEVE COHEN and KILLER, INC.
Plaintiff:
MINNETONKA MOCCASIN CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
