Cases 1 - 7 of 7
NUNEZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv04298
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
STEVE NUNEZ
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steve Nunez v. Unilever United States, Inc.
as 2:2020cv03846
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Steve Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson, et al v. Los Lunas Community Program, et al
as 16-2172
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WALTER STEPHEN JACKSON, by his parents and next friends, Walter and Helen Jackson, STEVE NUNEZ, by his guardian and next friend, Mary Kathryn Reed, RON FULLER, by his mother and next friend, Josephine Boughton and others
Plaintiff Intervenor - Appellee:
JOHN E. YOUNG, IRIS YOUNG, legal guardians and paren of Rita Kay Young, DORA L. ROMERO and others
Mark Aragon et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05631
Plaintiff:
Mark Aragon, Anthony Ares, Cheryl Armour and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Goins v. Apker et al
as 4:2013cv00295
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harold Goins, Jr.
Defendant:
Craig Apker, Wyonna Mixon, Susan McClintock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Giovanni G Licitra v. Steve Nunez
as 2:2012cv05432
Plaintiff:
Giovanni G Licitra
Defendant:
Steve Nunez
Jackson, et al v. Fort Stanton Hosp, et al
as 1:1987cv00839
Plaintiff:
Walter Stephen Jackson , Steve Nunez , Ron Fuller and others
Defendant:
Fort Stanton Hospital and Training School , Los Lunas Center for Persons with Developmental Disabilities , Jack Callaghan and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
John E Young
Intervenor:
ARC of New Mexico , Josephine Rutar, Ava Peets and others
Movant:
Sue A Gant, Dept. of Vocational Rehab for the State of New Mexico and Lyn Rucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
