Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Vierstra et al v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2023cv03042
Plaintiff:
Brian Vierstra and Stephanie Vierstra
Defendant:
Anthony Hamilton, Aaron Patterson, Douglas Welker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Barstow Proprietor Association et al v. City of Barstow et al
as 5:2023cv00926
Plaintiff:
Barstow Proprietor Association, Balubhai G. Patel, Ira Gwin and others
Defendant:
City of Barstow, a municipal corporation, Does 1-10 Inclusive, City of Barstow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv03144
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sheffield v. Jessamine County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2020cv00174
Defendant:
Crystal Hendren, Crystal Kuhn, Carolyn Sparkman and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Edward Sheffield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barberi v. DAVIS et al
as 0:2019cv61302
Defendant:
STEVEN EDWARD DAVIS and ANIMAL KINGDOM VETERINARY SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Way v. Tulsa East Child Support et al
as 4:2016cv00679
Plaintiff:
Steven Edward Way, Sr
Defendant:
Tulsa East Child Support Services , Karen S Smith and Catina R Drywater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
