Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Barela v. Yes Care et al
as 2:2024cv00049
Defendant:
Yes Care Doctor, Yes Care Nurse, Yes Care and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Richard Barela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TCHEUMANI v. SAUER et al
as 1:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
GERARD TCHEUMANI, JR.
Defendant:
ARBITRATOR STEVEN RICHARD SAUER and DISCOVER BANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
WINFIELD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08456
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RICHARD WINFIELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Well v. Thompson
as 2:2023cv00165
Petitioner:
Steven Richard Well
Respondent:
Mark Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PS) Young v. Burlingham et al
as 2:2022cv01712
Plaintiff:
Daniel Christopher Young
Defendant:
Steven Richard Burlingham, Gregory Ralph Beyer, David Louis Brown, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HAUGHT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18753
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RICHARD HAUGHT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FREDETTE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14951
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RICHARD FREDETTE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Steven Stiles, Jr.
as 22-5612
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN RICHARD STILES, JR.
(PS)Young v. Burlingham et al
as 2:2022cv00590
Plaintiff:
Daniel Christopher Young
Defendant:
Steven Richard Burlingham, David Louis Brown, Jr., Gregory Ralph Beyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Young v. Burlingham et al
as 2:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Daniel Christopher Young
Defendant:
Steven Richard Burlingham, David Louis Brown, Jr., Jennifer Schreiber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
