Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Pan Gas Storage LLC v. Rexford et al
as 6:2022cv01173
Plaintiff:
Pan Gas Storage LLC dba Southwest Gas Storage Company and Pan Gas Storage LLC doing business as Southwest Gas Storage Company
Defendant:
Merl D. Rexford, Marilyn J Rexford, Unknown Owners and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Freeman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 22-1306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM R. FREEMAN, III
Defendant / Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a/k/a JPMC Chase National Assoc., HARMON LAW OFFICES, P.C., JONES MOVING AND STORAGE COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, a/k/a FDIC, KELLER WILLIAMS, LYNN FREELAND and others
Campbell et al v. Saltville Gas Storage Company, LLC
as 2:2021cv00035
Plaintiff:
James Lee Campbell, Sr., Doris Whaley-Campbell and Deborah Ingrid Long
Defendant:
Saltville Gas Storage Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Hardy Storage Company, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00043
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lyn Jones
Defendant:
Columbia Gas Transmission, L.L.C. and Hardy Storage Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanson Cold Storage Company v. Chizek Elevator & Transport,, et al
as 16-2399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HANSON COLD STORAGE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIZEK ELEVATOR & TRANSPORT, INC., dba Chizek Transport and JASON SCOTT TURLEY, Individually and as Agent of Chizek Transport
Tate Logging Company, Inc. et al v. Monroe Gas Storage Company, LLC
as 1:2010cv00167
Plaintiff:
Tate Logging Company, Inc. and Tate Forestry Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Monroe Gas Storage Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monroe Gas Storage Company, LLC v. Gas storage rights under approximately 213.42 acres in Four Mile Creek Gas Storage Field, Monroe County, Mississippi, Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District
as 1:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
Monroe Gas Storage Company, LLC, Monroe Gas Storage Company, LLC, Monroe Gas Storage Company, LLC and others
Defendant:
Gas Storage Rights Under Approximately 213.42 acres in Four Mile Creek Gas Storage Field, Monroe County, Mississippi, Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
STECKMAN RIDGE GP, LLC et al v. AN EXCLUSIVE NATURAL GAS STORAGE EASEMENT BENEATH 10.078 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2008cv00180
Plaintiff:
STECKMAN RIDGE GP, LLC, SPECTRA ENERGY TRANSMISSION RESOURCES, LLC and NJR STECKMAN RIDGE STORAGE COMPANY
Defendant:
AN EXCLUSIVE NATURAL GAS STORAGE EASEMENT BENEATH 10.078 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 2.0 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JAMES L. GIPSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STECKMAN RIDGE GP, LLC et al v. 6.95 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2008cv00178
Plaintiff:
STECKMAN RIDGE GP, LLC, SPECTRA ENERGY TRANSMISSION RESOURCES, LLC and NJR STECKMAN RIDGE STORAGE COMPANY
Defendant:
6.95 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOE A. MCDANIEL, SANDRA K. MCDANIEL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STECKMAN RIDGE GP, LLC et al v. AN EXCLUSIVE NATURAL GAS STORAGE EASEMENT BENEATH 100.00 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2008cv00177
Plaintiff:
STECKMAN RIDGE GP, LLC, SPECTRA ENERGY TRANSMISSION RESOURCES, LLC and NJR STECKMAN RIDGE STORAGE COMPANY
Defendant:
AN EXCLUSIVE NATURAL GAS STORAGE EASEMENT BENEATH 100.00 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 0.82 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN MONROE TOWNSHIP, BEDFORD COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, KENNETH R. KLAHRE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
