Cases 41 - 50 of 160
Stovall v. Mullis et al
as 1:2014cv01165
Plaintiff:
Mark Stovall
Defendant:
Benjamin Johnson, Larry Steve Mullis and Farmer John, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bryant #463608 et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2014cv00869
Plaintiff:
Reo Bryant #463608, Larry Stovall #601852 and Anthony Lavelle Martin #460976
Defendant:
Harrell Smith, Helen Brinkman, Fritz Heartley and others
Movant:
Timothy E. Dixon #194514
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Department of Probation et al
as 1:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
Charles Dwayne Jackson
Defendant:
Department of Probation, Jamie Staggs, Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witcher et al v. Federal-Mogul Products, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00042
Plaintiff:
Steve Witcher , Sheila Witcher , Cody Witcher and others
Defendant:
Federal-Mogul Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bank of America, N.A. v. Nicholasville, KY City of et al
as 5:2014cv00078
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
Nicholasville, KY City of , JAH Nicholasville Investment #2, LLC, L-M Asphalt Partners, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stovall et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014dp20003
Plaintiff:
Morgan (Jess) Stovall and Cathy Stovall
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc v. Tennessee Production Center, Inc. et al
as 3:2013mc00024
Plaintiff:
Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc
Defendant:
Tennessee Production Center, Inc., John Norbert Stovall and Debi Stovall
Stovall v. Michael Lacour
as 1:2013cv01169
Plaintiff:
Gil Stovall
Defendant:
Michael Lacour
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
