Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Rojas v. SSPTM Holdings, Inc et al
as 0:2026cv62032
Plaintiff:
Dayana Rojas
Defendant:
SSPTM Holdings, Inc, Supreme Organics, LLC and James E. McDonnell, IV
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
(PS) Garcia v. California State Supreme Court
as 2:2026cv02557
Plaintiff:
Michael Garcia
Defendant:
California State Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit et al v. Northport City Of, et al
as 2:2026cv01290
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit, Go Go Satish, The Greatest Recording Artist and James Lambert
Defendant:
Northport City Of,, Florida Police Department, Seargant Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watts v. Parties Other than the Supreme Court of the United States
as 26-1989
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ALLAN WATTS
Defendant:
PARTIES OTHER THAN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Watts v. Parties Other than the Supreme Court of the United States
as 26-1992
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ALLAN WATTS
Defendant:
PARTIES OTHER THAN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Watts v. Parties Other than the Supreme Court of the United States
as 26-1995
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ALLAN WATTS
Defendant:
PARTIES OTHER THAN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Watts v. Parties Other than the Supreme Court of the United States
as 26-1990
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ALLAN WATTS
Defendant:
PARTIES OTHER THAN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Watts v. Parties Other than the Supreme Court of the United States
as 26-1993
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ALLAN WATTS
Defendant:
PARTIES OTHER THAN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Watts v. Parties Other than the Supreme Court of the United States
as 26-1994
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ALLAN WATTS
Defendant:
PARTIES OTHER THAN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Watts v. Parties Other than the Supreme Court of the United States
as 26-1986
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ALLAN WATTS
Defendant:
PARTIES OTHER THAN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
