Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Blair-Hanson v. Johnson et al
as 0:2019cv02195
Defendant:
Jensina Rosen, Susan Johnson and Aaron Engleson
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Blair-Hanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Davis County et al
as 1:2018cv00080
Defendant:
Todd Richardson and Davis County
Plaintiff:
FNU Hayes, Estate of Gregory Hayes, The and Susan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canty v. Corcoran et al
as 1:2018cv01404
Plaintiff:
Dafon Canty
Defendant:
Dayena M. Corcoran, Jeff Nines, William Boher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02289
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Allan v. Piper et al
as 0:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan, Sr
Defendant:
Emily Johnson Piper, David Herman, Nancy Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Annis Lloyd v. Lachlan MacNeish
as 15-6587
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNIS RECARDO LLOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
LACHLAN MACNEISH, MARTIN J. ADAMS, KENNETH SARVIS and others
Defendant:
EDWARD J. MCMAHON, A. R. FALES, JR., G. D. JOHNSON and others
Gilbertson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2015cv01563
Plaintiff:
Roger Michael Gilbertson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services , Kevin Moser , Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yasin v. Monaco et al
as 1:2014cv04711
Plaintiff:
Yasin Yasin
Defendant:
Michael Monaco, Moira Susan Johnson and Scott Sinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the et al
as 0:2013cv01074
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, the, Lucinda Jesson, Cal Ludeman and others
Little v. Johnson
as 3:2013cv00087
Petitioner:
Sylvester Leon Little
Respondent:
Susan Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
