Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Morgan v. Autry Greer & Sons, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv00101
Plaintiff:
Angela Morgan
Defendant:
Autry Greer & Sons, Inc. and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Autry v. Ahern
as 26-50474
Plaintiff:
Roy Autry
Defendant:
Ahern Rentals, Incorporated, also known as Ahern Rentals and Sales
SELKIRK v. AUTRY STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2026cv00043
Plaintiff:
FRANK LEE SELKIRK JR
Defendant:
AUTRY STATE PRISON and CARLOS BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2025cv01383
Plaintiff:
Janice Lynn Jones
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Oklahoma Child Protective Service, Miranda Guthrie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harvey v. Towler et al
as 7:2025cv00823
Plaintiff:
Tamar Devell Harvey
Defendant:
B.L. Towler, Spencer, P. Ridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Autry v. USA
as 2:2025cv13513
Petitioner:
Pierre Deshawn Autry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Behlmann v. Shaw et al
as 2:2025cv04240
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Behlmann
Defendant:
Fnu Shaw, Dan Knight, Fnu Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Behlmann v. Boone County et al
as 2:2025cv04235
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Behlmann
Defendant:
Boone County, Fnu Carrey, Fnu Stowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shirley v. Autry Greer & Sons, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv00131
Plaintiff:
Larry Shirley
Defendant:
Autry Greer & Sons, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
