Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Nathan Vest v. City of Ontario et al
as 5:2017cv02541
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Alex Villapondo, Brad Kaylor and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Vest
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard T. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Helen Langley et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv05490
Defendant:
Sargeant Sandoz, Officer Reyes, City of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Smith, Irvin Anderson, Helen Langley and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard T. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Timothy Sharp v. City of El Monte et al
as 2:2016cv02097
Defendant:
City of El Monte, El Monte Police Department, Detective J. Anastasia and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Sharp
Undetermined:
Richard T. Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FURNITURE BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2011cv00202
Plaintiff:
FURNITURE BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION , UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION , DEANA TANNER OKUN and others
Intervenor_defendant:
KINCAID FURNITURE CO., INC. , L. & J.G. STICKLEY, INC. , SANDBERG FURNITURE MANUFACTURING CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
C.M. Life Insurance Company v. Copeland et al
as 1:2010cv01110
Plaintiff:
C.M. Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Brittany T. Copeland, Kimberly D. Johnson, Amanda M. Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
NIEBLA v. COPELAND
as 5:2009cv00232
Plaintiff:
JORGE L NIEBLA
Defendant:
T COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cassina, S.p.A. v. T. Copeland & Sons, Inc.
as 2:2007cv00039
Plaintiff:
Cassina, S.p.A., Cassina, S.p.A., Cassina, S.p.A. and others
Defendant:
T. Copeland & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
