Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Johnson v. Boykins et al
as 2:2023cv02803
Plaintiff:
Justin T. Johnson
Defendant:
K. Boykins, Off. Bailey, D.R.T. Off. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marilyn Donald, et al v. Bonner, et al
as 2:2023cv02738
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Kirk Fields, Shelby County and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Donald and Charles Donald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, S.C.S.O. Jail Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Perry Johnson
as 22-3675
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PERRY T. JOHNSON
Johnson et al v. C.R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02195
Plaintiff:
Terri T Johnson and Christian P Johnson
Defendant:
C.R Bard Inc and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. Martino et al
as 2:2022cv10161
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Jackson
Defendant:
Martino, E. Nguyen, E. Parr-Mirza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson #685964 v. Martino et al
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Jackson #685964
Defendant:
Unknown Martino, E. Nguyen, E. Parr-Mirza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv02648
Plaintiff:
Wilbur T Johnson
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee, David Dyson, Lawrence Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv02647
Defendant:
Wilbur T Johnson, Shelby County,Tennessee, David Dyson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv02650
Plaintiff:
Wilbur T Johnson
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee, SGT David Dyson, SGT Lawrence Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
