Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Carroll v. Turner
as 5:2026cv01306
Petitioner:
Robert Gene Carroll
Respondent:
Sheriff Kevin Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson et al v. FCI Lewisburg et al
as 1:2026cv13387
Plaintiff:
Robert Willie Johnson and Conners-Beron
Defendant:
FCI Lewisburg, Essex County Correctional Facility, Meredith A. Vacca and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Carroll, Sr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2026cv00352
Petitioner:
James Charles Carroll, Sr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Baker v. Doe et al
as 1:2026cv02354
Plaintiff:
Nikki Michelle Baker
Defendant:
John Doe and Dean Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv02971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Carroll v. Runnels et al
as 6:2026cv00347
Plaintiff:
James Charles Carroll, Sr
Defendant:
Curtis R Runnels, Jr, Sgt Courtney M Costales, Sgt Tabitha L White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RANGER v. METZGAR et al
as 1:2026cv00180
Plaintiff:
ROBERT-DAVID RANGER
Defendant:
JAMES METZGAR, MICHAEL B. CARROLL, KARA TAMPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carroll v. Uber Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv07264
Plaintiff:
Denise Carroll
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, LLC, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Carroll v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv05578
Plaintiff:
Donald Carroll
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, De Cubas & Lewis, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
