Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Chapman v. Angel
as 3:2023cv00497
Plaintiff:
Tonya T Chapman
Defendant:
Kirk J Angel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Abney et al v. Gomez et al
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
James D. Abney, Benjamin Acuna, Gonzalo Erick Aguilar-Vargas and others
Defendant:
Christopher Gomez, Federal Correctional Institution McDowell, Colette S. Peters and others
Petitioner:
Antonio Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Federal Tort Claims Act - Disposition by Agency Req
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Grout v. Lookingbill et al
as 3:2021cv03071
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Grout
Defendant:
Captain James Lookingbill and Sergeant T. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Netflix, Inc.
as 20-2007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Glen S. Chapman, Jason T. Chapman and Tamita Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
Netflix, Inc., Apple Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv80795
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv80796
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff Unknown v. Defendant Unknown
as 1:2019cv01503
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Jason T Chapman, Tamita Brown and Glen S Chapman
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff Unknown
Defendant:
Defendant Unknown
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Brown et al v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01507
Plaintiff:
Glen S Chapman, Tamita Brown and Jason T Chapman
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc., Apple Inc. and Netflix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
CHAPMAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv04763
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN T. CHAPMAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
