Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Ward, et al v. City of Hobbs, et al
as 19-2137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA TODD, DENNIS HARGROVE and OCTAVIA WARD
Defendant / Appellee:
TROY D. BRACKEEN, a Hobbs Police Department Officer, CITY OF HOBBS, ZAKARIAH T. DALE, a Hobbs Police Department Officer and others
Ward et al v. City of Hobbs et al
as 2:2018cv01025
Defendant:
Ruben Gastelum, Troy D Brackeen, City of Hobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hargrove, Sandra Todd and Octavia Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2017cv01520
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2016cv02280
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffery A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2015cv01959
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
Robert Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dale et al
as 1:2014cv00281
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jackson
Defendant:
Corey T. Dale and Cook-Dupage Transportation Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WebMD Health Corp. v. Dale
as 1:2011cv03314
Plaintiff:
WebMD Health Corp.
Defendant:
Anthony T. Dale
Interested_party:
Health Grades, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WEBMD HEALTH CORP. v. DALE
as 2:2011cv05827
Plaintiff:
WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
Defendant:
ANTHONY T. DALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Credit Acceptance Corporation v. Dale
as 1:2011cv01739
Plaintiff:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant:
Gregory T. Dale
Movant:
Dealer Funding, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Gregory T. Dale
Counter_defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Credit Acceptance Corporation v. Dale
as 2:2011cv00083
Plaintiff:
Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant:
Gregory T. Dale
Movant:
Dealer Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
