Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Garcia v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08490
Plaintiff:
Jacob T Garcia
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Law v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv05127
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Law
Defendant:
Scott Peters, Mary Robnett and T Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00874
Plaintiff:
Rolando L Diaz
Defendant:
Ron D Neal, C Frediarelli, G Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bouillon v. Garcia
as 2:2022cv00123
Petitioner:
Amber M Bouillon
Respondent:
Anthony T Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Garcia et al v. Cenlar FSB a/k/a Cenlar Agency, Inc.
as 7:2021cv00481
Counter Defendant:
Israel T. Garcia and Noemi Garcia
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB a/k/a Cenlar Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PC) Ellis v. Santoro et al
as 2:2021cv01851
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Ellis
Defendant:
K. Santoro, T. Garcia, B. Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gulf Coast Erectors v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. et al
as 4:2021cv02971
Plaintiff:
Gulf Coast Erectors
Defendant:
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc., Risk Placement Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GARCIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40520
Plaintiff:
MARTIN T GARCIA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
