Cases 1 - 10 of 61
JACKSON et al v. CITY OF MITCHELL et al
as 4:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
CALVIN JACKSON, AJ, CJ and others
Defendant:
CITY OF MITCHELL, LAWRENCE COUNTY INDIANA, LAWRENCE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JACKSON et al v. CITY OF MITCHELL et al
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
CALVIN JACKSON, AJ, CJ and others
Defendant:
CITY OF MITCHELL, LAWRENCE COUNTY INDIANA, LAWRENCE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SCHREANE v. WATSON et al
as 2:2022cv00236
Petitioner:
CLARENCE D. SCHREANE
Respondent:
T. J. WATSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TENNESSEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SOLIS v. WATSON
as 2:2021cv00462
Petitioner:
ARTURO SOLIS
Respondent:
T. J. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GALE v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00275
Plaintiff:
BRIAN GALE
Defendant:
T. J. WATSON, WASSON, SCHMALENSEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00215
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. PROSECUTOR OF SAN ANTONIO, TX and T. J. WATSON
Plaintiff:
MARCUS D. WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JIMINEZ v. WATSON
as 2:2021cv00206
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY JIMINEZ
Respondent:
T. J. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PRESSLEY et al v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00202
Plaintiff:
NIJUL ALEXANDER, JAMES R. PRESSLEY, AMIN RICKER and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and T. J. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CLOWERS v. WATSON
as 2:2021cv00172
Petitioner:
GEORGE CLOWERS
Respondent:
T. J. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
