Cases 41 - 50 of 632
Jones v. Snyder
as 0:2022cv03311
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Jones
Defendant:
Snyder and Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
(PC) Robinson v. Hurra et al
as 2:2022cv01601
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Daniel Robinson
Defendant:
G. Hurra, D. Torres, T. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Kiser et al
as 0:2022cv02797
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Jones
Defendant:
Officer Kiser, Smith, Chau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. May et al
as 1:2022cv01057
Petitioner:
Quentin T. Jones
Respondent:
Robert May and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Perry
as 3:2022cv01043
Plaintiff:
Shawanda T. Jones
Defendant:
Corella A. Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Robinson v. Lynch et al
as 2:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Daniel Robinson
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, W. Caruso, T. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13125
Plaintiff:
L T JONES, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Women of Color For Equal Justice v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
as 22-1832
Petitioner:
Women of Color For Equal Justice, R. Tousaint, E. Pallas and others
Respondent:
United States Department of Labor and Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Jones v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00708
Petitioner:
Quentin T. Jones
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
