Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Charles T. Mathews et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv09212
Petitioner:
Mr Charles Theodore Mathews and Cindy Feng Chiang
Plaintiff:
Charles T Mathews and Cindy F Chiang
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
Neal v. Deputy Director et al
as 1:2019cv21754
Defendant:
John Guerrera, Jr., P. Frade, Deputy Director and others
Plaintiff:
Mike E. Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrison v. Rochlin et al
as 5:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
Fabian T. Morrison
Defendant:
Karen E. Rochlin , Coleman Medium Officials , Tamyra Javis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MORRISON v. ROCHLIN et al
as 3:2016cv01417
Plaintiff:
Fabian T. Morrison
Defendant:
Karen E. Rochlin , Coleman Medium Officials , Tamyra Javis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathews v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00536
Plaintiff:
Williams T Mathews
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Torres v. Caincioso et al
as 5:2015cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jorge Luis Torres
Defendant:
Robert Caincioso , Evelyn Pizarro, F. Thorn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MORRISON v. ROCHLIN et al
as 2:2015cv00133
Plaintiff:
FABIAN T. MORRISON
Defendant:
KAREN E. ROCHLIN, COLEMAN MEDIUM OFFICIALS, TAMYRA JAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathews v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09439
Plaintiff:
Holly T. Mathews
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWELL v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
MALIK POWELL
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, M. BROWN and T. MATHEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
