Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Joseph v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv08883
Plaintiff:
Joy Joseph
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. doing business as JF Labs, Inc., Avlon Industries, Inc., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gerow v. DOJ - United States Department of Justice, et al.
as 26-4673
Defendant:
KEITH RICHERSON, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Jane or John Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC GEROW
Hall v. Arns et al
as 1:2026cv01492
Plaintiff:
Murray Hall, III
Defendant:
Sgt. Arns, Officer McCall Echevarria and Parole Officer (John Doe)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Michael Paul Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv07535
Plaintiff:
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund, Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Michael Paul Company, Inc., Michael Paul Company, Inc., Julia Maher and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
