Cases 1 - 10 of 22
El Ttee v. District Court of Maryland for Prince Georges County et al
as 8:2023cv02763
Plaintiff:
Tocho Cheveyo El Ttee
Defendant:
District Court of Maryland for Prince Georges County, Circuit Court of Maryland for Prince Georges County, States Attorney Timothy Hatfield and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Patricia Patterson v. Commissioner
as 19-1326
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICIA T. PATTERSON
Patterson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2017cv01899
Plaintiff:
Patricia T Patterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Patterson v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv05747
Plaintiff:
Everett T. Patterson
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Patterson v. Goldsmith et al
as 0:2011cv00475
Plaintiff:
Patricia T Patterson
Defendant:
Brooks P Goldsmith and AutoZone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. South Carolina Worker's Compensation Commission, The et al
as 3:2010cv02968
Plaintiff:
Patricia T Patterson
Defendant:
South Carolina Worker's Compensation Commission, The, Lisha Booth, Dana Stogner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Stogner et al
as 0:2010cv02456
Plaintiff:
Patricia T Patterson
Defendant:
Dana Stogner and Lisha Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. AutoZone Auto Parts Inc
as 0:2010cv02438
Plaintiff:
Patricia T Patterson
Defendant:
AutoZone Auto Parts Inc and Gallagher Bassett Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patricia Patterson v. James Barber, III
as 10-1861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICIA T. PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES R. BARBER, III, GEORGE FUNDERBURK, SUSAN BARDEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
