Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Smith v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Smith
Defendant:
R. Owens, B. Dotson, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS SMITH and FRANCIS T. SMITH
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Clark
as 1:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Smith
Defendant:
Harold Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddick v. Rose et al
as 7:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
Sgt. J. Rose, C/O T. Neece, C/O H. Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emmanuel McGriff El v. Centralize Infraction Bureau
as 22-7384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL LEE MCGRIFF EL
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRALIZE INFRACTION BUREAU, NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Bruce Bey v. Peter Becker
as 22-6954
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUCE RILEY BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER BECKER, TIMOTHY BAXLEY, MARCIA FRYE and others
McGriff El v. Centralize Infraction Bureau et al
as 5:2022ct03311
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lee McGriff El
Defendant:
Centralize Infraction Bureau, North Carolina Superior Court, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Kittrell et al
as 5:2022hc02110
Petitioner:
Robert S. Ballard
Respondent:
Sgt. V. Kittrell, Officer T. Smith, Officer Fina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bey v. Becker et al
as 4:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Bruce Riley Bey
Defendant:
Peter Beclar, Timothy Baxley, Marcia Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
