Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Healy v. Miller et al
as 4:2024cv04053
Plaintiff:
Bret Healy
Defendant:
Charlene Miller, Patrick T. Smith, First Judicial Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Johnson v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Michael A Johnson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Shipman, Maurice Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Ford, Jr. v. John Stanley, et al
as 23-3445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Owen Ford, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
John Stanley, Sheriff, Lonoke County, William Robert Shipp, Administrator, Lonoke County, T. Smith and others
Ford v. Stanley et al
as 4:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
Daniel Owen Ford, Jr
Defendant:
John Stanley, William Robert Shipp, T Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkins v. Hutchinson et al
as 2:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Parkins
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, K Lay, Dexter Paine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skinner v. USA et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Frank Skinner
Defendant:
USA, John P Yates, Tomar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00120
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smith v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00087
Plaintiff:
Teonie T. Smith
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
