Cases 1 - 10 of 176
Johnson v. Palmer et al
as 4:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Jaquwez Johnson
Defendant:
John Palmer, Thomas Robinson, T. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Thomas, Darreyll v. Raatz et al
as 3:2023cv00880
Plaintiff:
Darreyll T. Thomas
Defendant:
Deputy Raatz, Deputy Ceithammer, Jane Doe 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas, Darreyll v. Doe, John et al
as 3:2023cv00791
Plaintiff:
Darreyll T. Thomas
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Dane County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coles v. Thomas et al
as 9:2023cv01293
Plaintiff:
Joshua Coles
Defendant:
T. Thomas, Pat Russo and Prime Care Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas, Jr. v. Knutson, et al
as 23-7067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOR T. THOMAS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK KNUTSON, DAVID LOUTHAN, Warden, LADANA HAMILTON and others
THOMAS v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2023cv00786
Petitioner:
DALVECCIO T. THOMAS
Respondent:
EDDIE BUFFALOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMAS v. DIAL
as 1:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
DALVECCIO T. THOMAS
Defendant:
SARGEANT DIAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-7059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOR T. THOMAS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK KNUTSON, DAVID LOUTHAN, Warden and others
THOMAS v. UNKNOWN OFFICERS AT SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
DALVECCIO T. THOMAS
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICERS AT SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
