Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Ashley Heath Baker v. Larry Chandler, et al
as 23-5015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHLEY HEATH A. BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY D. CHANDLER, Warden, COOKIE CREWS, RHONDA D. MAY and others
Baker v. Chandler et al
as 0:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ashley Heath A Baker, Anthony Baker, Ashley Heath Baker and others
Defendant:
Larry D. Chandler, Cookie Crews, Rhonda May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Chandler et al
as 4:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Ashley Heath A Baker
Defendant:
Larry D. Chandler, Cookie Crews, Rhonda May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
T.C. Elliott v. Leon Golston, et al
as 22-5323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
T.C. TYRA ELLIOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
LEON GOLSTON, Deputy, CHAD CUNNINGHAM, Sergeant, DEDDRICK MOORE, Deputy and others
Carter v. Collins et al
as 7:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Charles Carter
Defendant:
Larry Ross Collins, D. Barton, C.C. Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Smith et al
as 5:2021ct03247
Plaintiff:
Robert Merritt
Defendant:
T.C. Smith and J. Riddle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moon v. USA
as 3:2020cv01118
Defendant:
M. Puckett, Kathy Hill, David Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell W. Moon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
MAY v. BRADLEY et al
as 3:2020cv00047
Defendant:
COUNSELOR M. NAGLIC, CASE MANAGER J. SPEILVOGEL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GORAL and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL THOMAS MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Henderson v. Shepard et al
as 5:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Asst. Commissioner Alan Watson, Regional Director Scott Crickman, South Region Residential ReEntry Office and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Phillip Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mikel v. Smith T.C. et al
as 6:2020cv00007
Plaintiff:
Dominique D. Mikel
Defendant:
Smith T.C. and Smoke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
