Cases 1 - 10 of 75
HOLDER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
NORRIS G. HOLDER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and T.J. WATSON
Respondent:
STEVEN KALLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
of the house of Stutzman et al v. Gatt et al
as 3:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
ruth-ann of the house of Stutzman, r. j. and a. h.
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Gatt, P. Joseph Hass, Jr., Michael J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
of the house of Stutzman et al v. Gatt et al
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
ruth-ann of the house of Stutzman, r. j. and a. h.
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Gatt, P. Joseph Hass, Jr., Michael J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
GALE v. COCHRAN et al
as 2:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
BRIAN GALE
Defendant:
COCHRAN, SWANEY, T.J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
AGOFSKY v. WATSON
as 2:2022cv00049
Petitioner:
SHANNON WAYNE AGOFSKY
Defendant:
U.S.P. TERRE HAUTE WARDEN
Respondent:
T.J. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PAUL v. WATSON
as 2:2021cv00471
Petitioner:
LEE ANDREW PAUL
Respondent:
T.J WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
GODWIN v. GILBERT et al
as 2:2021cv00428
Plaintiff:
ROGER GODWIN
Defendant:
GILBERT, DUSTIN A. HOLMES, T.J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GODWIN v. HOLMES et al
as 2:2021cv00417
Plaintiff:
ROGER DALE GODWIN, ADEEB OMAR ASAMA LAIDEN and ADEEB OMAR OSAMA LAIDEN
Defendant:
DUSTIN A. HOLMES, T.J. WATSON, EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CLOWERS v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00402
Plaintiff:
GEORGE LEROY CLOWERS
Defendant:
T.J. WATSON, A. FRENCH, B. CARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
