Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 510
State of Utah et al v. Walsh et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00016
Not Classified By Court: State of Iowa
Plaintiff: State of Utah, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant: Martin Walsh, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor and Martin J Walsh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00007
Plaintiff: State of Alabama, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae: Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Carter v. McDonough et al
as 6:2022cv01275
Plaintiff: Stephanie Carter
Defendant: Denis Richard McDonough and United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Amicus Curiae: Robert Wilkie and States of Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
State of Louisiana v. Becerra
as 22-30748
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant / Appellant: Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health & Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children & Families and others
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff: Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., Janet Woodcock, M.D. and others
Intervenor Defendant: Danco Laboratories, LLC and Danco Laboratories LLC
Amicus Curiae: The Chattanooga National Memorial for the Unborn, Doctors for America, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hargrove v. Fraport New York, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01088
Plaintiff: Ashley Hargrove
Defendant: Fraport New York, Inc., Fraport USA, Inc., Fraport Tennessee, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
United States for the Use and Benefit of APAC-Tennessee, Inc. et al v. Riverside Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00535
Counter Defendant: United States for the Use and Benefit of APAC-Tennessee, Inc. and APAC-Tennessee, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Riverside Construction Co., Inc.
Defendant: Miller Materials, Inc. and The Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Arce v. Walton et al
as 4:2022cv02887
Plaintiff: Ashley Arce
Defendant: Ronnie Cornelius Walton, Tennessee Steel Haulers, Inc. and Ronnie Cornelius Walton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Haddad v. Comcast of Arkansas Louisiana Minnesota Mississippi Tennessee
as 3:2022cv02625
Plaintiff: Freddie Haddad
Defendant: Comcast of Arkansas Florida Louisiana Minnesota Mississippi Tennessee, Comcast of Arkansas Louisiana Minnesota Mississippi Tennessee L L C doing business as Comcast Corp, Comcast Cable Communications Management L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Elliott Electric Supply, Inc. v. Module X Solutions, LLC
as 9:2022cv00106
Plaintiff: Elliott Electric Supply, Inc.
Defendant: Module X Solutions, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant: Tennessee Valley Authority, Eaton Corporation and Synthetic Materials
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?