Cases 1 - 10 of 201
Pace v. City of Douglasville Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv03007
Defendant:
Douglas Judicial Circuit, City of Douglasville Police Department and Officer Ali Al-Husseini
Plaintiff:
Terry Terrell Pace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HORN v. WELLS et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Defendant:
BILL EDDINS, JON S WHEELER, JOSHUA A MICHELL and others
Plaintiff:
LUTHER ARTHUR HORN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pace v. Turner
as 1:2024cv02427
Defendant:
Roland Y. Turner, Jr., Douglas Judicial Circuit and Dalia Racine
Plaintiff:
Terry Terrell Pace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antoine v. Terrell
as 2:2022cv06204
Plaintiff:
Toby Lee Antoine
Defendant:
Terry Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terrell et al v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2022cv00710
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Plaintiff:
Roland Terrell and Terri Terrell
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
US v. Terry Perry
as 22-4043
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRY TERRELL PERRY
Mayberry v. Woodard et al
as 4:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Mayberry
Defendant:
Sheriff Calvin L. Woodard, Jr., Marc Connor, Ellis Darius and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayberry v. Woodard et al
as 5:2021cv00393
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Mayberry
Defendant:
Sheriff Calvin L. Woodard, Jr., Marc Connor, Darius Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUSSEY BEY v. CRUMPLER et al
as 1:2020cv00865
Defendant:
MOORE, SIKES, WHITLEY and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY TERRELL HUSSEY BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Terry Samuels
as 20-2403
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States
Defendant / Appellant:
Terry Terrell Samuels, also known as T.G.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
