Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Wehner v. Genentech, Inc., et al.
as 24-2630
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WEHNER
Defendant:
GENENTECH, INC. and UNITED STATES ROCHE DC FIDUCIARY COMMITTEE
Wehner v. Genentech, Inc., et al.
as 24-697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW WEHNER, Individually and as a representative of a class of similarly situated persons, on behalf of the U.S. Roche 401(K) Savings Plan
Defendant / Appellee:
GENENTECH, INC. and UNITED STATES ROCHE DC FIDUCIARY COMMITTEE
Vellali v. Yale University
as 23-1172
Plaintiff:
Ranay P. Cirillo, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan and Tara Heard, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Joseph Vellali, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan, Nancy S. Lowers, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan, Jan M. Taschner, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Yale University, Michael A. Peel and The Retirement Plan Fiduciary Committee
Vellali v. Yale University
as 23-1082
Plaintiff:
Ranay P. Cirillo, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan and Tara Heard, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Vellali, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan, Nancy S. Lowers, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan, Jan M. Taschner, Individually and as representative of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Yale University Retirement Account Plan and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Yale University, Michael A. Peel and The Retirement Plan Fiduciary Committee
Lalonde v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2022cv30147
Plaintiff:
Judy Lalonde
Defendant:
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, Roger Crandall, Investment Fiduciary Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Pedersen et al v. Kinder Morgan, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv03590
Plaintiff:
Curtis T Pedersen and Beverly Leutloff
Defendant:
Kinder Morgan Inc, Kinder Morgan Retirement Plan A, T. Mark Smith and others
Interested Party:
Mercer (US), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BARNES v. ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2021cv00985
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. BARNES
Defendant:
ROLLS-ROYCE NORTH AMERICA FIDUCIARY COMMITTEE and ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Pedersen et al v. Kinder Morgan, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv10388
Defendant:
Jesse Arenivas, Kinder Morgan Retirement Plan A, Unidentified Members of the Kinder Morgan Retirement Plan A Fiduciary Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis T Pedersen and Beverly Leutloff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Garcia et al v. Alticor, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01078
Defendant:
Alticor, Inc., John Does 1-30, The Fiduciary Committee of Alticor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Hart, Andrea P. Brandt and Joshua Garcia
Not Classified By Court:
Facilitative Mediator
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wehner v. Genentech, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv06894
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wehner
Defendant:
Genentech, Inc., U.S. Roche DC Fiduciary Committee, David McDede and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
