Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Egolf v. The Public Defender Agency - Principle agent et al
as 4:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Norman Egolf
Defendant:
The Public Defender Agency - Principle agent and Tom Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CABLE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES CABLE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, INDIANA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE, INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keen Smith, Jr. v. DPS, et al
as 21-35835
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEEN L.A. SMITH, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, DEPARTMENT OF LAW, ALASKA COURT SYSTEM and others
Harry v. The Alaska Parole Board et al
as 3:2021cv00190
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Harry
Defendant:
The Alaska Parole Board, The Alaska Court System, The Alaska Department of Corrections and others
Smith v. Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2021cv00137
Petitioner:
Keen L.A. Smith, JR.
Respondent:
Department of Public Safety, Department of Corrections, Department of Law and others
TAYLOR v. DIENHART et al
as 1:2020cv03110
Defendant:
K. CUTCLIFF, PHIL BOWERS, MARION COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDGE v. HAWKINS et al
as 1:2020cv02668
Defendant:
JAMES BELL, MIKE HART, RYAN MEARS and others
Plaintiff:
VINSON L. EDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHIRLEY v. PITTS et al
as 1:2019cv04498
Defendant:
JASON DOUGLAS BUNCH, MARION COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER AGENCY and LAURA PITTS
Plaintiff:
HENRY SHIRLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYOR v. MARION COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER AGENCY et al
as 1:2019cv02627
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL I. TAYOR
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER AGENCY, CHRISTINE BABB and YONI MOISE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. MARION SHERIFF DEPT. et al
as 1:2018cv03979
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER AGENCY, BELANGER, BABB and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE LEE PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
