Cases 1 - 10 of 42
CLEMENT v. WASHINGTON POST
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
AUDREY CLEMENT
Defendant:
WASHINGTON POST
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
EDWARDS v. LOGAN et al
as 1:2023cv02258
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Defendant:
STEVEN P. LOGAN, JOHN JOSEPH TUCHI, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
GILL v. VIOREL et al
as 1:2023cv02117
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
STEVEN VIOREL, AUSTIN GILL, BLOCK BY BLOCK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. New York Times et al
as 1:2023cv02105
Plaintiff:
Brenda K. Sanders
Defendant:
New York Times, Washington Post, Fox News and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Evenstad v. Lynden et al
as 0:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Thomas Evenstad
Defendant:
Tom Lynden, A.J. Lague, Eric Chaleaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtiss Davis, III v. Edwin Roessler
as 22-1179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTISS DAVIS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWIN C. ROESSLER, Chief of Police, WUSA9 NEWS, THE WASHINGTON POST and others
Defendant:
SUSAN PEREZ, ANA ELIZABETH RIVERA-CRUZ, PEDRO BONILLA and others
INKO-TARIAH v. WASHINGTON POST et al
as 1:2021cv00815
Plaintiff:
CHARLES AWUSIN INKO-TARIAH
Defendant:
WASHINGTON POST, RALPH NEWMAN and EDWARD III LANDIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis III v. Roessler Jr. et al
as 1:2020cv00992
Defendant:
Pedro Bonilla, Edwin C. Roessler Jr., WUSA9 News and others
Plaintiff:
Curtiss Davis III
Range v. Van Metre et al
as 1:2020cv00123
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Stacey, Magistrate Judge Michael Nachmanoff and others
Plaintiff:
Davetta Lynn Range
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsa et al v. Google L.L.C. et al
as 3:2019cv02407
Defendant:
Larry Page, John Does 1-29, Sergey Brin and others
Plaintiff:
Cyrus A. Parsa, Judges, Uyghurs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
