Cases
Parker v. United States of America et al
as 4:2022cv00364
Plaintiff: Theodore Parker
Defendant: United States of America, United States Postal Service and John Damian Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Eric Bates, et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-17094
Plaintiff / Appellant: JESSE LEWELLING, JOHNSON MANDAZ, JOHNNY O. SANCHEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee: MATTHEW CATE, Former Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, CARL WOFFORD, Warden, Avenal State Prison, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Former Governer of the State of California and others
Bates et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2014at00965
Plaintiff: Eric Bates , Paul Blevins , Michael Blue and others
Defendant: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey Beard, Paul Brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates et al v. Schwarzenegger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv02085
Plaintiff: Eric Bates , Paul Blevins , Michael Blue and others
Defendant: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey Beard, Paul Brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theodore Parker v. Warden, et al
as 14-15566
Petitioner - Appellant: THEODORE PARKER
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Parker v. Jones et al (INMATE 3) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00011
Plaintiff: Theodore Parker
Defendant: Karla Jones and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Theodore Parker
as 12-6110
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: THEODORE PARKER
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv03360
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?