Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Green v. Florez et al
as 1:2015cv07928
Plaintiff:
Pierre Green
Defendant:
Officer Victor Florez, Officer Matthew Wirth, The City of Chicago and others
Movant:
Daniel Thomas Coyne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Coyne v. Omnicare, Inc.
as 14-2026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS COYNE
Defendant - Appellee:
OMNICARE, INC., EDWARD O'CONNELL and BETH MESEROLL
Coyne v. Omnicare, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01225
Plaintiff:
Thomas Coyne
Defendant:
Omnicare, Inc., Edward O'Connell and Beth Meseroll
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
American Alternative Insurance Corporation v. Coyne
as 3:2014cv01483
Plaintiff:
American Alternative Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Thomas Coyne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00379
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Glenn Thomas Coyne v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2011cv00868
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Glenn Thomas Coyne
COYNE et al v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv62509
Plaintiff:
THOMAS COYNE and INA COYNE
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION, UNARCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rothenberg v. Dau
as 10-4411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Saul Rothenberg, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Ebrahim Abood, Individually and on behalf of all others similary situated, Tobby Kombo, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Matthew Daus, Diane McGrath-McKechnie, Joseph Eckstein and others
Thomas Coyne v. Anchor Packing Co., et al.
as PAE/2:10-CV-68337
Plaintiff:
Thomas Coyne
Defendant:
Anchor Packing Co
COYNE v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv68337
Plaintiff:
THOMAS COYNE
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY , A P GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
