Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Arthur v. Dunn et al
as 1:2017cv00221
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Arthur
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Arthur v. Commissioner, AL DOC, et al
as 17-11879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS D. ARTHUR
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ANNE ADAMS HILL, General Counsel, Alabama Department of Corrections, in her official capacity and HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Arthur v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2016cv00866
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Arthur
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn , Anne Adams Hill and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Arthur v. Commissioner, AL DOC, et al
as 16-15549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS D. ARTHUR
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WARDEN
ARTHUR v. DUNN
as 5:2015mc00016
Plaintiff:
THOMAS D ARTHUR
Defendant:
JEFFERSON DUNN
Movant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Thomas Arthur v. Warden, et al
as 15-10653
Petitioner - Appellant:
WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS D. ARTHUR
In re: Commissioner, AL DOC, et al
as 15-10262
Petitioner:
In re: COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Mandamus Respondent:
THOMAS D. ARTHUR
Arthur v. Thomas et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2011cv00438
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Arthur
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Anthony Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur v. Allen et al
as 1:2008cv00441
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Arthur, Thomas D. Arthur and Thomas D. Arthur
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Grant Culliver, Stephen Billy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arthur v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv00722
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Arthur
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Richard Allen, Holman Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
