Cases 21 - 30 of 1,193
Thomas Perez v. Matthew Hutcheson
as 17-35076
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW HUTCHESON
Edward Hugler v. S&H Restaurant, Inc.
as 17-1091
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor United States Department of Labor (Wage and Hour Division)
Defendant - Appellant:
S&H RESTAURANT, INC., d/b/a Aroma Indian Cuisine, MANDAL ENTERPRISES L.C, d/b/a Aroma Indian Cuisine, TEJAL RESTAURANT, INC., d/b/a Aroma Indian Cuisine and others
Perez v. Lechler et al
as 2:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Michael A. Lechler, Exterior Systems, Inc. and Exterior Systems, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Thomas Perez, et al vs. Soldiers of the Cross, et al
as 5:2017cv05014
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Soldiers of the Cross and Dennis Murray
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
Perez v. Valley Hotel et al
as 4:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Valley Hotel and Thomas E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thomas E. Perez et al v. Fitbe, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00446
Defendant:
Fitbe, Inc., Ha-Jireh Investment, Inc., Victor Han and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Perez v. Dax Deals Inc., et al.
as 2:2017cv00003
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Dax Deals Inc. and Dax Yarborough
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Perez v. Dax Deals Inc., et al.
as 5:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Dax Deals Inc. and Dax Yarborough
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Lakewood Meats, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Lakewood Meats, Inc. and John Rose
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Prahlad, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00206
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Prahlad, Inc., Prahlad (Peter) Patel and Kokila Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
