Cases 41 - 50 of 145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aror O'Diah v. Richard Cordray, et al
as 17-5170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Aror Ark O'diah
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Cordray, Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, JPMorgan Chase & Co., also known as JPMorgan Chase Corporate, also known as Chase Bank and others
BEDFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv01471
Plaintiff:
BEDFORD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER, INC. , CAREGROUP, INC., and others
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Joyce Bookshester v. Thomas Price
as 17-2478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOYCE BOOKSHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PRICE, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Progressive Michigan Insurance Company v. Department of Health and Services
as 1:2017cv00658
Plaintiff:
Progressive Michigan Insurance Company
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services, Thomas E. Price and Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bajwa, MD v. Price, MD
as 3:2017cv00792
Plaintiff:
Saeed A. Bajwa, MD
Defendant:
Thomas E. Price, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
HARRINGTON v. PRICE
as 2:2017cv03161
Plaintiff:
GAIL HARRINGTON
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ARIA HEALTH et al v. PRICE
as 1:2017cv01402
Plaintiff:
ARIA HEALTH , ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK , ARMSTRONG COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Vapne v. Perdue
as 17-2169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Genrikh Vapne
Defendant - Appellee:
Sonny Perdue, Ben Carson, Nancy A. Berryhill and others
Cooley v. Price
as 2:2017cv12229
Defendant:
Thomas E. Price
Plaintiff:
Warren W. Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
